We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The National Detterence Act of 2495
Details
Submitted by[?]: Démocrates de la Gauche
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2495
Description[?]:
Article 1 Click here to remove this proposal. Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare. Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first. Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first. Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:25:03, December 03, 2007 CET | From | Démocrates de la Gauche | To | Debating the The National Detterence Act of 2495 |
Message | This bill does not retain to be used against the DPL. But for the future of defense against much larger nation enemies, not rogue provinces. This will be the most effective detterence against any enemy and there is also and option by the President to use them as well, so it's not like every enemy we have we have to use nukes against them. |
Date | 04:25:04, December 03, 2007 CET | From | Démocrates de la Gauche | To | Debating the The National Detterence Act of 2495 |
Message | This bill does not retain to be used against the DPL. But for the future of defense against much larger nation enemies, not rogue provinces. This will be the most effective detterence against any enemy and there is also and option by the President to use them as well, so it's not like every enemy we have we have to use nukes against them. |
Date | 05:22:16, December 03, 2007 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the The National Detterence Act of 2495 |
Message | UCC abhors nuclear weapons and we are not comfortable having our nation stock them or threaten them against any nation. The kind of damage nuclear weapons cause will bring about the deaths and mutilation of thousands of innocent people - people far removed from any problem that could develop between nation-states. We wish the Jelbanian military to only use conventional weaponry - not nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons. |
Date | 08:15:59, December 03, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary Constit'nal United Front | To | Debating the The National Detterence Act of 2495 |
Message | Nuclear weapons are used for deterrent purposes. It is a dangerous weapon for both sides, but it is a necessary evil. We will support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 112 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 303 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 86 |
Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
Random quote: "Morality is simply the attitude we adopt towards people whom we personally dislike." - Oscar Wilde |