We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fireworks Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Saiserist League
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2495
Description[?]:
| "What the people of Zardugal must understand is that fireworks are far more dangerous than their image in pop culture would lead us to think. They are nothing more than bombs, and they are bombs that parents allow their children to play with. Children have been permanently damaged, scarred, even killed by these colorful bombs. Now I enjoy a good fireworks show as much as anybody, but I know full well I would never wish to handle one of those myself or, God forbid, allow one of my children to handle them. By permitting this we are endangering innocent children who know no better. So let's keep the fireworks, but leave them in the hands of competent professionals. That doesn't seem too crazy, does it? Vote with the lives of children on your conscience, and thank you for your time." -Daniel V. Feterokov, in the proposition speech to the National Directory |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards fireworks.
Old value:: Local governments determine fireworks laws.
Current: Professionals may run licensed fireworks shows, small fireworks are legal to the general public.
Proposed: Only professionals may run licensed fireworks shows, fireworks are illegal to the general public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 167 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 234 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." - Winston Churchill |