We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partie Patriotique de Kanjor
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2496
Description[?]:
| These proposals are to restore the rights of the provincial governments with regard to matters of health. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Food safety policy.
Old value:: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Current: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Proposed: Local governments determine food safety standards.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Health and safety legislation for industry.
Old value:: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Current: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Proposed: Health and safety laws are to be determined by local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: The use of cannabis is legal.
Current: All naturally occurring drugs are legal.
Proposed: Recreational drug use is regulated by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:28:12, December 04, 2007 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | Non non oui! |
| Date | 22:40:32, December 04, 2007 CET | From | Partie Patriotique de Kanjor | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | We may be prepared to split this bill. |
| Date | 22:53:37, December 04, 2007 CET | From | 2ème PPPP | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | So you would allow areas of our nation to not actively introduce and regulate food safety and health and safety legislation. That's really smart. |
| Date | 23:37:03, December 04, 2007 CET | From | Partie Patriotique de Kanjor | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | The Provincial governments are quite as capable as the central government to ensure adequate regulations in those fields. |
| Date | 23:46:10, December 04, 2007 CET | From | 2ème PPPP | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | But the only thing they could do differently than the central government is lower standards, so why do it? |
| Date | 05:50:43, December 05, 2007 CET | From | Partie Patriotique de Kanjor | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | It is based upon the idea of subsidiarity, that is is the principle which states that matters ought to be handled by the smallest (or, the lowest) competent authority. |
| Date | 06:15:11, December 05, 2007 CET | From | 2ème PPPP | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | What about the idea that if there's just one logical, irrefutable way to do something then you should make sure that it's done instead of leaving the possibility that it won't be done? |
| Date | 06:17:10, December 05, 2007 CET | From | Partie Patriotique de Kanjor | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | What about autonomy? Also you appear to have overlooked the part of the above post which reads "competent authority". |
| Date | 06:33:12, December 05, 2007 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | Well why handle things by dozens of little agencies when we can do it here quicker faster and more uniformly. |
| Date | 06:37:05, December 05, 2007 CET | From | Partie Patriotique de Kanjor | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | Why is more uniformly supposed to be better? A healthy diversity we feel is the way to go. |
| Date | 08:19:27, December 05, 2007 CET | From | 2ème PPPP | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | See, what exactly would there be a diversity of with these laws? Some regions not have high standards and others having high standards is not healthy diversity. |
| Date | 14:45:42, December 05, 2007 CET | From | Partie Patriotique de Kanjor | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | We are sure that all provinces will have acceptable standards, they may vary, but there is nothing wrong with that. |
| Date | 02:44:35, December 06, 2007 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | A varying set of standards can only be disastrous, we most hold ourselves to the highest standards. |
| Date | 08:16:13, December 06, 2007 CET | From | 2ème PPPP | To | Debating the Reconstitution des Droites Provinciales - Santé |
| Message | John doesn't hold himself to very high standards. I love you anyways though. Love, Wilma |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 140 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 110 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun." - Ralph Nader |