Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 00:47:41
Server time: 03:12:18, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): dnobb | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Konstantin Reichsohn Memorial Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Workers Army

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2497

Description[?]:

In honour of the retirement of former SuDP hardliner, and War Party Chief, Konstantin Reichsohn - the TDP proposes a new direction:


Articles One and Four address the evils of researching weapons technology. Our ability to destroy ourselves long ago outstripped our ability to save lives - we seek to undo some of this lack of equilibrium. Thus - no research on weapons.

Article Two devolves the rights and responsibilities for local defence... to the local government.

Article Three removes our obligation to maintain subversive and invasive forces in external areas. We have no objection to some form of internal agency, at this point.

Article Five removes the burden for looking after POW's. We advocate that they be left on small offshore archipelagoes around Meria, with specific agreement between our own nation and the 'host' nation that they can come and pick up their POW's without risk of being fired upon. Let our opponents pay for the housing, feeding, retraining and redeployment of their own soldiers.

Article six is a little out of character for us - seeming so authoritarian, but it really isn't out of character with our disarmament agenda. We shouldn't be making new and painful weapons - and we certainly shouldn't be selling them.


As an additional, we suggest a resolution:

"That Likatonia forego all conventional arms development, and concentrate on more 'environmentally aware', fuel independent and less esoteric technology".

To this end, we have commissioned Clokkenheimer and Werkitagorsk to research 'conservative technologies'. These initial findings have suggested some attractive options in the field of dirigibles, and direct-drive artillery. We recommend all Convocation members consider the many benefits of steam-powered armour, prop-driven zeppelins, and 'clokk-werk' cannon.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:10:26, December 05, 2007 CET
FromKapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei
ToDebating the The Konstantin Reichsohn Memorial Bill
Message
NO, NO, NO!!!

We can only compromise on Article 6 that says arms can only be exported on a case by case basis.

Date19:16:25, December 05, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the The Konstantin Reichsohn Memorial Bill
MessageArticle Six doesn't say that..

Date19:17:02, December 05, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the The Konstantin Reichsohn Memorial Bill
MessageWe decry the warlike agenda of the red-fascist CWFP.

Date19:26:50, December 05, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the The Konstantin Reichsohn Memorial Bill
MessageWe would support, if it weren't for article six.

Date19:47:03, December 05, 2007 CET
FromAxis Mundi Democratic Bloc
ToDebating the The Konstantin Reichsohn Memorial Bill
MessageWe do not support Article 3 or 5. We must maintain some level of intelligence gathering capability. As for returning prisoners of war to their own countries, this would not make much sense in wartime. I mean, if we send the PoW's back to a country we are warring with, whats to stop them using them against us again??

We will abstain unless we can be persuaded.

Date07:20:53, December 06, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the The Konstantin Reichsohn Memorial Bill
MessageThe returning of POW's is a strategic measure. Every POW held in Likatonia requires food, shelter... even guards. If we hold the POWs, we have to feed them, clothe them, shelter them - guard them. All at our own cost, and we gain little advantage.

On the other hand, if we allow our adversary to come and collect their own soldiers, they have to pay for transport, they have to spare the men to do the transporting, and the vessels required. Then they pay to feed, house, etc their own POWs, until they have them debriefed, retrained and redeployed.

This could easily take each POW out of the war for - maybe - half a year, and compels the adversary nation to take care of them for the whole time they are out of service.

There are other advantages if one thinks about it... the great psychological effect it will have on the citizens of the adversary nation, for example... the morale effect on their soldiers, and the fact that we never have to worry about escapes, or deal with our own people fussing about POW camps being located nearby.

Date10:42:40, December 06, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Workers' Party and CTUL List
ToDebating the The Konstantin Reichsohn Memorial Bill
MessageWe are ardent supporters of this glorious bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 268

no
      

Total Seats: 398

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Voters have an extra appreciation for bills that actually get passed, so if you want to maximally take profit from your votes, make sure you compromise with others.

    Random quote: "To live anywhere in the world today and be against equality because of race or color is like living in Alaska and being against snow." - William Faulkner, Essays, Speeches and Public Letters

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 93