We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Likaton Coalition of the Willing
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2497
Description[?]:
| We propose a shake up in our government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's capital city.
Old value:: 339
Current: Clovisport
Proposed: 352
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The National Animal.
Old value:: Rhonda Schtuker
Current: Likatonian Eagle
Proposed: The Likaton Truffle Schwein
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The method used to determine the number of seats each region receives in the national legislature.
Old value:: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Current: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Proposed: Equal representation, regardless of region population.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:36:46, December 06, 2007 CET | From | Neue Kommunistische Liga | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | 1. No 2. Anything other than the current animal is fine 3. Meh, we suppose 4. No 5. No So sorry, but this gets a no from us. |
| Date | 06:38:21, December 06, 2007 CET | From | Permissive Social Union | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | Yes. |
| Date | 07:31:11, December 06, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | The representation one is okay. The animal is okay. We don't like the idea of relocating the Convocation, especially with the history Anakagrad has for some of us... On the other hand, the Head of State article is okay, and the cabinet one is not entirely horrible. Sigh... so conflicted We shall support, and attempt to block the actual move to Anakagrad, should the bill pass. We really see nothing but disadvantage in moving the capitol to some offshore peasant colony. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 229 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 437 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "Because we don't think about future generations, they will never forget us." - Henrik Tikkanen |