Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 03:42:16
Server time: 04:17:43, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2497

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2498

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:54:19, December 07, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2497
MessageAny comments? Make them soon since I plan to put this to a vote shortly.

Date21:05:17, December 07, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2497
Messageunfair

Date06:22:21, December 08, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2497
MessageI'm not really sure how it's unfair.

Date08:54:10, December 08, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Peoples of Lodamun Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2497
MessageIt's unfair in precisely the same way you declared the IRP proposal unfair.

Date11:11:36, December 08, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2497
MessageUnfair and not including your parties in my opening proposal are not the same thing. I do believe the IRP cabinet was unfair and as a result it was rightly defeated in both incarnations. Despite my disagreements I have included Independent Republicans in this governing coalition which will have a broad base of support. Rather than simply complaining that a cabinet is "unfair" you should have negotiated as I invited you to do - the opportunity to debate did not even exist last time.

Date17:30:48, December 08, 2007 CET
FromIndependent Republican Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2497
MessageThe first cabinet proposal I made seemed very fair since it gave the URP more seats than it currently has proposed for itself in this cabinet. However, since the URP rejected those seats in the first cabinet, I left them out of the second proposal.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
          

    Total Seats: 81

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 15


    Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures.

    Random quote: "The more you observe politics, the more you've got to admit that each party is worse than the other." - Will Rogers

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 67