We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Free TV
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2508
Description[?]:
This proposal will be for late night TV. Primetime Tv will still follow the same standards. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: Sexually explicit material is allowed, but violent or hard core pornography is banned.
Current: Sexually explicit material is allowed, but violent or hard core pornography is banned.
Proposed: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:30:00, December 07, 2007 CET | From | Saiserist League | To | Debating the Free TV |
Message | "'Free TV', or Traumatic TV? There will still be children up late at night, where these standards are in place, and this will certainly do them truly irreperable damage. The only things currently disallowed are violent or hard-core pornography, which are certainly allowed on purchase. That hardly seems like a restriction on freedom, it is merely a necessary clause to protect children." -Daniel Vladimirovich Feterokov, Chairman of the Revolutionary Socialist Party |
Date | 01:36:06, December 18, 2007 CET | From | Order Of The Illuminati | To | Debating the Free TV |
Message | It is up to parents, not the government, to decide what is appropriate material for children to watch. |
Date | 14:03:38, December 19, 2007 CET | From | Irish Party | To | Debating the Free TV |
Message | Parents can't be around 24/7. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 23 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 144 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 149 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "I don’t have facts to back this up." - Herman Cain |