We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environmental Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2500
Description[?]:
| TBD |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:10:22, December 07, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
| Message | I'm sorry, but we'll oppose |
| Date | 22:08:02, December 07, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
| Message | We oppose this. "Highly restrictive" is obviously not going to be good for the economy, and we are already having problems with keeping industries strong. |
| Date | 18:15:29, December 08, 2007 CET | From | Flemish Liberation Front | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
| Message | oppose --- |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 25 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 241 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 233 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to prevent confusion by ensuring unofficial or outdated bills labelled as "Cultural Protocols" are removed from their nation page. |
| Random quote: "In all recorded history there has not been one economist who has had to worry about where the next meal would come from." - Peter Drucker |