We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to protest
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Libertarian party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2103
Description[?]:
Oh, if they believe it poses a risk? because all police are that professional and totally won't use that excuse at all. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Current: The police may disperse a group without giving any reason.
Proposed: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:56:47, August 29, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Right to protest |
Message | And what about groups of roiters? Or rival gangs who maybe about to conflict? |
Date | 12:33:56, August 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Right to protest |
Message | nazi's and the antifa protesting at the same place, same time... (example) |
Date | 17:12:45, August 29, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Right to protest |
Message | ...So now our police is a facist Nazi-supporting party? |
Date | 20:24:41, August 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Right to protest |
Message | federalists for freedom, do something! if this'll pass we have anarchy! |
Date | 06:22:41, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Social Libertarian party | To | Debating the Right to protest |
Message | The cops can hang out and wait for something to happen, like seeing someone with a gun or someone punching someone else. One dude getting capped out by five cops should be good enough to stop it. Plus this would be abused a lot more than it would be benefical. |
Date | 08:35:28, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Right to protest |
Message | never seen that happening where i live... only off course if you think nazi's and antifa can protest next to eachother but the police does something when they beat the hell out of eachother... |
Date | 09:50:31, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Social Libertarian party | To | Debating the Right to protest |
Message | The cops can BE there but they can't do anything untill something starts. Plus if you were a cop and you could get away with it wouldn't you beat the nazis? I would. |
Date | 20:32:26, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Right to protest |
Message | you also have to beat the antifa... and who sais the cops dont have nazi-sympathies? |
Date | 09:53:37, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Social Libertarian party | To | Debating the Right to protest |
Message | They MIGHT, that's my point. You have to assume that the government will push the limits of the current laws |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 81 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 76 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 43 |
Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
Random quote: "If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution." - Emma Goldman |