Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 01:51:38
Server time: 18:08:21, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | Paulo Nogueira | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Liberties Act 2498

Details

Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Socialist Front

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2499

Description[?]:

An act to protect the civil liberties of the people.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:44:43, December 10, 2007 CET
From Anarchitarians
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act 2498
MessageArticle 1: Yes. :/
Article 2: No. No gun control.
Article 3: Yes. :/
Article 4: No. Ban marriage.
Article 5: Yes.
Article 6: Yes.

Date05:10:02, December 10, 2007 CET
From Revolutionary Socialist Front
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act 2498
MessageAnarchitarian, you have to admit that even the articles with which you disagree are improvements compared to what we have no. I reckon it would probably be in your best interests to vote for this bill. (Also you will very quickly learn that in this game you have to compromise.)

And why do you have ":/" next to articles associated with homosexuality? Are you a homophobe?

Date07:32:23, December 10, 2007 CET
From Anarchitarians
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act 2498
MessageArticle 3: No.

There, I compromised. And my vote stays no. I'm not a homophobe. Lol. Cross-dressing is not normal unless for humorous reasons. I voted yes for adoptions by couples. I do not support any form of marriage. I vote no because my views about gun control trump all else.

Date07:37:51, December 10, 2007 CET
From Hulstrian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act 2498
MessageOOC: "Cross-dressing is not normal unless for humorous reasons". Hahahahaha. Wow.

Date07:43:01, December 10, 2007 CET
From Anarchitarians
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act 2498
MessageHulstrian, I have nothing against drag queens. I'm a peaceful person, But in a society I envision such mental illness should not flourish. At first I agreed and said who cared because with military service for all, cross dressing would be minimalized through education. If you read the DSM charts for mental illness, delusional behavior is rated as a 30, indicating severe mental illness. People who are cross dressers just don't fit my view of society. I'm tribalist by nature; I advocate harm to none and peace for all. Cross dressers can have their own country or city or something.

Date01:43:20, December 11, 2007 CET
From Revolutionary Socialist Front
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Act 2498
MessageAnd what if, in your society, a man started to dress like a woman because he wanted to?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 267

no
     

Total Seats: 195

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements.

    Random quote: "Hence it comes about that all armed Prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed Prophets have been destroyed." - Niccolo Machiavelli

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 82