We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Nudity Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Labour Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2105
Description[?]:
Local governments shall be required to permit nudist colonies and beaches, although other nudity laws shall be left to them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:56:13, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Social Republican Party | To | Debating the Public Nudity Act |
Message | okay. |
Date | 03:15:26, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Public Nudity Act |
Message | There is no reason to legislate this at a national level. If it needs legistlation it should occur at a local level. |
Date | 10:35:24, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Leviathan Party | To | Debating the Public Nudity Act |
Message | We agree with the PP; though we cannot imagine why a region would legalize public nudity, if they want to that's their business. We certainly can't see the harm. |
Date | 20:49:15, August 30, 2005 CET | From | United Labour Party | To | Debating the Public Nudity Act |
Message | I was going to suggest that nudity should be allowed in private areas nationwide, and other nudity laws should be determined by local governments. |
Date | 22:02:03, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Public Nudity Act |
Message | OOC: Then wouldn't the local law option make more sense. With the provision that it is permitted in private. |
Date | 22:03:13, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Public Nudity Act |
Message | OOC: actually the bill is only in reference to public nudity. So I am not sure what you mean. |
Date | 18:16:49, August 31, 2005 CET | From | United Labour Party | To | Debating the Public Nudity Act |
Message | What I meant is that public spaces should be designated for nudists, but nudity outside those areas can be punished by local government. |
Date | 16:24:33, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Public Nudity Act |
Message | We still see you proposal as not matching the description. And really do not see the need for national control over this issue, we are unsure if it even needs local control. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 25 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 67 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 8 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "Law is mind without reason." - Aristotle |