We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religion
Details
Submitted by[?]: Stärke und Sicherheit Koalition
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2500
Description[?]:
| We do not approve of religion, but allow citizens to be religious in their own homes. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's intervention in the appointment of ministers of religion.
Old value:: The state does not intervene in the appointment of ministers of any religion whatsoever.
Current: The state does not intervene in the appointment of ministers of any religion whatsoever.
Proposed: The state nominates ministers of religion, but the appointment is left up to the religious communities themselves.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: Any form of religion is banned.
Current: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Proposed: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:05:48, December 12, 2007 CET | From | Republican Socialist Party | To | Debating the Religion |
| Message | firstly the state and religion should be seperate!!! |
| Date | 18:51:19, December 12, 2007 CET | From | Computational Intellect Project | To | Debating the Religion |
| Message | We do not support any intervention in minister choosing. But, if pressed, we could support allowing religion; as long as organized religion is still kept in check with it abolished. |
| Date | 21:04:41, December 12, 2007 CET | From | Globale Verbesserung Partei | To | Debating the Religion |
| Message | The GVP has always been supportive of unorganized faith and philosophy and strongly opposed to any religion which evangelizes or makes any attempt to convert "non-believers". Such a proposal to allow “religion” (to use the term loosely) would be considered by the GVP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 151 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 274 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "There is a mandate to impose a voluntary return to traditional values." - Ronald Reagan |