We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PSFVP Buisness Ownership Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2500
Description[?]:
We feel the current laws are far to restrictive, and limit the types of buisness that can flourish in Sekowo. It is laws like these that limit and damage our economy. We must lighten them to promote further growth. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on Democratic Workers' Councils.
Old value:: The government requires all businesses to be run by Democratic Workers' Councils.
Current: The government encourages the formation of Democratic Workers' Councils through subsidies and tax exemptions.
Proposed: The government encourages the formation of Democratic Workers' Councils through subsidies and tax exemptions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:20:33, December 12, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the PSFVP Buisness Ownership Bill |
Message | We will support this, though only as a temporary thing, to see how it works out. |
Date | 07:07:51, December 12, 2007 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Buisness Ownership Bill |
Message | We do not believe the government needs to be increasing its spending at this moment. |
Date | 08:26:43, December 12, 2007 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the PSFVP Buisness Ownership Bill |
Message | Our surplis is back in the billions, and thanks to our free market reforms, our economy is sure to boom, we can afford now to try and stimulate further growth. |
Date | 09:31:23, December 12, 2007 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Buisness Ownership Bill |
Message | We dislike subsidizing Democratic Worker's Councils. Upon reflection, however, we find this preferable to absolutely requiring them. We shall vote in the affirmative. |
Date | 02:32:11, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Buisness Ownership Bill |
Message | Why should we subsidize companies for something they already have? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 532 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 218 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "Idealism is fine; but as it approaches reality, the cost becomes prohibitive." - William F. Buckley, Jr. |