We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environmentalism Regulations
Details
Submitted by[?]: Tuesday Is Coming
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2104
Description[?]:
| Right now the voters seem pretty unaware of how the different parties stand on environmental issues. I am satisfied with most of the current variable values, but I feel that the visibilites of each party need to be increased, the positions made known.(GA is considered "moderate", for example). Therefore, I propose this bill to remove mandatory ecological restrictions. If the leftists would like to propose increasing regulations, that would also accomplish the same purpose, by allowing us to vote on those issues and make our stances known. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government provides pollution prevention guidelines, but does not enforce them.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government-sponsored recycling programs.
Old value:: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Current: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Proposed: There is no national policy regarding recycled garbage.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:22:00, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Environmentalism Regulations |
| Message | Supported. |
| Date | 05:43:41, August 30, 2005 CET | From |  Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Environmentalism Regulations |
| Message | Put to a vote to beat the elections. These issues have been debated in the past, and the first procedure act never passed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 156 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 144 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago." - George Porter |