We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the International Agreement on Climatre Protection
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Authoritarian Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2501
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the International Agreement on Climatre Protection. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the International Agreement on Climatre Protection.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:48:01, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Saiserist League | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Agreement on Climatre Protection |
| Message | "Finally, our good political allies of the National Authoritarian Movement have drafted a full, comprehensive plan to protect our nation's forests from the claws of the capitalists." -Viktor Lubkovsky, Minister of Environment and Tourism |
| Date | 17:38:23, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Irish Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Agreement on Climatre Protection |
| Message | Great treaty. |
| Date | 06:35:06, December 14, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Agreement on Climatre Protection |
| Message | "It was "the capitalists" who originally legislated Zardugal into compliance with this treaty. Long before the hallowed halls of the Directory were marred by extreme Communists, my Party and our allies realized that the future of Zardugal needed to be protected from short term financial gain." ~Harvard Andrews, DM |
| Date | 09:08:13, December 14, 2007 CET | From | National Authoritarian Movement | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Agreement on Climatre Protection |
| Message | "The compliance to this treaty was ensured by our environment bill which passed less than 6 months ago. If it was your party which made all these changes possible, why you vote against this bill?" |
| Date | 10:50:05, December 14, 2007 CET | From | Saiserist League | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Agreement on Climatre Protection |
| Message | "Certainly there may well have been purported capitalistic parties in the past who also advocated envionmentalism against the desires of so-called socialists and communists. But the past is dead, the present is now, and it appears to me that it is the Leftist parties that are attempting to protect the long-term stability of this country against the wishes of the capitalists. One cannot rid a 'nay' vote with false analogies of the past." -Justin Viniviev, DM |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 217 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 184 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Rarely is the question asked: is our children learning?" - George W. Bush |