We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Segregation Outlaw Act of 2501
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christliche Demokratie
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2502
Description[?]:
Article 1
Click here to remove this proposal.
Proposal[?] to change Policy concerning racial segregation in educational institutions.
Old value:: Segregation policy is set by local governments.
Current: Segregation policy is set by local governments.
Proposed: Segregation is illegal in all educational institutions. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:53:40, December 15, 2007 CET |
From |  Anarchitarians | To | Debating the The Segregation Outlaw Act of 2501 | | Message | I vote no because in our multicultural society it is important that each and every individual culture is learned and celebrated. This is only accomplished through individualised education focused on each culture and the preservation thereof. By strengthening each individual culture, it makes us a more vibrant and worldly society with distinct cultures that strengthen our multiculturalism. |
| Date | 23:09:06, December 15, 2007 CET |
From | Christliche Demokratie | To | Debating the The Segregation Outlaw Act of 2501 | | Message | That sounds good and we would like that idea, but the fact is that most people don't associate and won't associate segregation with that idea. Segregation has only furthered division in ethnic groupes and a responsible member of the Diet would vote to try something new, because segregation does not work and it is not working for Gishoto. Also the support of segregation by the nationalist Hulstrian parties only shoots Hulstrians in the foot and divides our country even more. Through segregation we will only preserve out differences and refuse to integrate. Integration is hard but in the end though perseverence our nation will become one with God and will stand together in unity. Seperation does not promote unity. Segregation is what promotes seperatism, segregation is what promotes radical nationalism as no one was ever mandated to be with somone else of their race. Now I urge all members voting for segregation and division to reconsider their votes and vote for a unity and a chance at peace between the races. |
| Date | 01:58:09, December 16, 2007 CET |
From | Anarchitarians | To | Debating the The Segregation Outlaw Act of 2501 | | Message | Your theory of multiculturalism is tragically flawed. What you are doing is destroying all culture in Hulstria through multicultural fascism. The point of multiculturalism is difference. If we destroy our differences, then we no longer exist multiculturally. Separation does promote unity because to each his or her own and the unity is found in appreciation of individual cultures that are preserved. There is no peace with your multicultural theory because there is no peace in fascism and eventually you're system will be overthrown. That is a given for all fascism is always overthrown. Stop being regressive and setting this planet up for chaos every century with your small minded one size fits all fascism. You speak of freeing the minds of Hulstrians--they need freed from you. |
| Date | 02:42:17, December 16, 2007 CET |
From | Christliche Demokratie | To | Debating the The Segregation Outlaw Act of 2501 | | Message | We'll have to see that in the coming election. But whose unity are you speaking of? Are you speaking of unity of the entire nation or just Hulstrians? We want unity of the entire nation. And common sense, segregation does not promote national unity, that is the unity we speak of, not unity of one ethnic groupe, but unity of the entire nation, we are trying to build one nation and one people united. We do not believe that we brand the name of facism, I rather not take it there but if there was a policy that would be more labeled "facists" it would be segregation. Forcing peoples to live differently, encouraging peoples to looks at another groupe and in your sense of the word think "we have enough unity as it is within our own groupe. Who needs them?"So I think we should let the common man say what he has to say, what sounds more like facism? The opposition as you can see looks to define this as one size fits all as for example, that it will not work in Gishoto. Well when did one size fits all become bad? If it fits the world,then surely it will fit Gishoto. So in the end facism sounds like a more enforced sounding policy, what sounds more enforcing? Using more and more money to set up different schools, universities, colleges, libraries? Or allowing every person wanting an education to attend a place of learning? What sounds more facists? A government telling a person that they are sattisfied with their own ethnic groupes and the other one is unnecesary for unity? Or encouraging people to work together and build a greater Gishoto? The Anarchitarians and their rhetoric call for war, it calls for strife, and it mostly calls for hatred. To them this is not a muliticulturalism debate, this is a Hulstrian superiority debate. They don't give a care if the next morning Gishoto is consumed with smokes of civil wars. As long as segregation and rhetorical Hulstrian superiority continues they will let the nation smolder. |
| Date | 04:09:04, December 16, 2007 CET |
From | Reichspartei | To | Debating the The Segregation Outlaw Act of 2501 | | Message | We are typically a very liberal party, but this is one issue in which we have a very illiberal stance, we do rather hate those Gishotoi. |
| Date | 07:08:46, December 16, 2007 CET |
From | Anarchitarians | To | Debating the The Segregation Outlaw Act of 2501 | | Message | Ja, I don't approve of the slur on Asians. My foreign counsel is Asian. And CD--I thought you were the CCP. I saw Christian and used to them being of that heading. By I do stand by my beliefs. With this in the hand of local governments, obviously their will be cities of all makes. Each culture will have their own cities, and there will be cities for which all of Hulstria can congregrate. It really is the best policy if we want lasting peace. |
| Date | 07:34:45, December 16, 2007 CET |
From | Christliche Demokratie | To | Debating the The Segregation Outlaw Act of 2501 | | Message | Jajaja please don't say that. Jajaja. Yes I understand what you mean by peace but lasting I don't believe. In the long run complete seperation will be achived and what is the point of our nation? Why not have two nations? We are here to preserve the union and to make the union stronger, not to dodge the question of the future of two ethnic groupes. We know that we are in this together, and that it will be hard to integrate, but in the far end everyone will benefit and we will truly be a union and we will be one nation under God, and one people. Not one nation two peoples, two Gods. |
| Date | 13:53:41, December 16, 2007 CET |
From | Christian Communist Party | To | Debating the The Segregation Outlaw Act of 2501 | | Message | It is not often we say this but the Christian Democrats are right entirely on this issue. Remember the teachings of our Lord Jesus according to Matthew: "Love your neighbor as yourself." If we do not love our brothers who have strayed from the lord, what hope is there of ever bringing them into the fold? The best policy is of one nation united and equal, not two nations divided and unequal. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 260 |
| no | Total Seats: 196 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 44 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "It is never too late to give up our prejudices." - Henry David Thoreau
|