We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Decency and Sexual Leniency
Details
Submitted by[?]: Saiserist League
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2503
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:09:21, December 17, 2007 CET | From | National Authoritarian Movement | To | Debating the Public Decency and Sexual Leniency |
| Message | We fully agree to this reasonable bill. |
| Date | 01:20:32, December 18, 2007 CET | From | Order Of The Illuminati | To | Debating the Public Decency and Sexual Leniency |
| Message | Public sexual acts should not be automatically criminalized, and should be handled on a case-by-case basis by the citizenry rather than the government. For example, if two people are caught in a public park around many disapproving people in the middle of the day, citizens should take direct action and voice their disapproval, and call for the offending parties to cease their activities and "get a room." In the case of nightclubs and social clubs that are sexual in nature, the persons leading these clubs should voluntarily warn all persons entering that sexual acts may take place within their realms, and have persons who enter their premises consent in advance to witnessing or participating in sexual activities. Any place where consenting adults gather publicly and the majority within approve of the sexual nature of these places should not, under any circumstances, be cited criminally. The government should be limited to dealing with matters of sex in non-consenting cases only, as in the criminal violation of an individual (sexual assaults and coercion/abuse of minors). |
| Date | 01:24:14, December 18, 2007 CET | From | Saiserist League | To | Debating the Public Decency and Sexual Leniency |
| Message | Those do not count as 'public' places, and sexually implicit acts are not covered by this bill. This bill would allow for sexually implicit acts, merely drawing the line at sexual intercourse itself. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 240 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 93 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
| Random quote: "No one today can afford to be innocent, or indulge himself in ignorance of contemporary governments, politics and social orders. The national polities of the modern world maintain their existence by deliberately fostered craving and fear: monstrous protection rackets. The 'free world' has become economically dependent on a fantastic system of stimulation of greed which cannot be fulfilled, sexual desire which cannot be satiated and hatred which has no outlet except against oneself, the persons one is supposed to love, or the revolutionary aspirations of pitiful, poverty-stricken marginal societies like Cuba or Vietnam. The conditions of the Cold War have turned all modern societies - communist included - into vicious distorters of man's true potential." - Gary Snyder |