Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 01:03:17
Server time: 14:56:42, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | itsjustgav | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Sexual Responsibility Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Endralon

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2039

Description[?]:

It is our strong belief that it is always better to prevent a problem from occurring in the first place than to attempt to fix it later on. Unwanted pregnancy is no exception. Therefore, we propose that the government should encourage the use of contraception while discouraging abortions.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Datenot recorded
From Communist Party of Endralon
ToDebating the Sexual Responsibility Act
MessageI'd like to see some comments on this... how about you, DSP?

Datenot recorded
From Democratic Socialists of Endralon
ToDebating the Sexual Responsibility Act
MessageWe will never accept any restriction on the rights of a woman to control her own body and we believe this right is essential in any society where equality between both sexes is protected. While we would support subsidised or free contraception which should help to reduce the number of abortions we will only vote for this as a seperate bill as there will still be circumstances where a woman might want to terminate her pregnancy beyond the limit which article one is attempting to enforce.

Datenot recorded
From Communist Party of Endralon
ToDebating the Sexual Responsibility Act
MessageWe don't see how abortion has anything to do with equality between the sexes, nor do we see the logic behind the idea that a human being (male or female) should have the option to surgically remove a body part for no good medical reason. What if someone said he/she wanted to have a perfectly healthy kidney removed? Would you support that, too?

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Sexual Responsibility Act
MessageKidneys don't tend to screw up your life. If one does, you get it removed. By your logic, we'd outlaw piercings. And vasectomies.

Datenot recorded
From Communist Party of Endralon
ToDebating the Sexual Responsibility Act
MessageSince you can give up a baby for adoption, it doesn't have to screw up more than 9 months of your life. And piercings don't involve the removal of whole organs. Neither do vasectomies.

Datenot recorded
From Democratic Socialists of Endralon
ToDebating the Sexual Responsibility Act
MessageAbortion is very much to do with women's equality since men are already free from the burden of pregnancy and abortion allows women equal rights to avoid a pregnancy they are unhappy with.

Datenot recorded
From Communist Party of Endralon
ToDebating the Sexual Responsibility Act
MessageNo, CONTRACEPTION allows women to avoid a pregnancy they are unhappy with. With widely available contraception and sexual education in schools, there is no excuse for abortions that are not medically necessary.

Datenot recorded
From Communist Party of Endralon
ToDebating the Sexual Responsibility Act
MessageBesides, it's not like I'm asking to ban abortion or anything... I know there might also be good non-medical reasons to perform an abortion (for example if the pregnancy was the result of rape), which is why I support first trimester abortions.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 147

no
  

Total Seats: 115

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

    Random quote: "Politics have no relation to morals." - Niccolo Machiavelli

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64