We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty of Terina
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2503
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Treaty of Terina. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty of Terina.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:44:01, December 19, 2007 CET | From |  Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Terina |
| Message | Why was this made a second time, weare still unsure as to whatallegations the DSP speaksof... |
| Date | 04:48:34, December 19, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Terina |
| Message | Because it failed the first time, even if we had not brought forward the information/allegations, it would still be lacking support enough to pass. |
| Date | 11:04:56, December 19, 2007 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Terina |
| Message | The NPP waswondering why localgovernment was left out of many of the options, i was wondering if DSP could answer that? |
| Date | 12:54:34, December 19, 2007 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Terina |
| Message | Well, the DSP would certainly rather have Socialist control over all of Sekowo; leaving things up to the local government prevents this (at a federal level, at least). Clearly, they don't want to leave those options open. The question is, why was it left in when it was clear that the Normand Pluralist Party would not support any treaty expressly forbidding local governance? |
| Date | 00:08:26, December 20, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Terina |
| Message | Because not all of them had local options, and because we consider them things that are best handled by the Federal Government. |
| Date | 02:18:41, December 20, 2007 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Terina |
| Message | HDLP, why did you vote no on this? NPP, would you vote yes if local goverment options were included? |
| Date | 06:44:31, December 20, 2007 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Terina |
| Message | Yes, though we certainly have reservations about the treaty, we would vote yes for peace's sake, if those measures were included and the HDLP had a chance to voice their own concerns. |
| Date | 11:15:52, December 20, 2007 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Terina |
| Message | The HDLP is more than welcome to share it's concerns. In fact, we really want them too. |
| Date | 02:28:12, December 22, 2007 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Terina |
| Message | Again the peace process is stalled! IC, HDLP why do you vote no on this bill? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 356 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 203 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 191 |
| Random fact: When you join the game, you will find yourself with only zero seats. That's because your party's representatives haven't been elected yet. You need to establish your party's position on issues by proposing several bills that your party wants passed and sending them to vote. This raises your visibility and if you do it enough, you will win seats at the next election. |
| Random quote: "The political ballot box stands for willingness to be ruled by somebody other than yourself." - Alvin Lowi, Jr. |