Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 01:07:38
Server time: 02:52:21, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Urban Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2504

Description[?]:

LUP -> 5
CP -> 4
MKP -> 4

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:02:45, December 20, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageYou have all got to be kidding me...!
MKP, you vote for a cabinet proposal that does not include you and you rise against a one that does include you?

Date20:35:04, December 20, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageHeh. Should have just voted for my proposed cabinet.

Date20:36:36, December 20, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageLiberal Fox update then it is...

Date20:42:33, December 20, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageOh, the MKP is immature. Ouch.

Date20:57:54, December 20, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageI just found a reason to RP.

Date21:00:35, December 20, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageYeah. I should've written something about Ahlam dying. Ah well.

Date21:01:05, December 20, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageEverybody can post there; so do it!

Date21:03:46, December 20, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageMy fake obituaries aren't very good.

Date21:05:09, December 20, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageWho said mine are? So, try to use the station more often.

Date22:34:46, December 20, 2007 CET
FromModerate Kafuri Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageI tell you why I voted no.

The KSP does not have any seats in this cabient, It is only logical that they should get atleast more seats than I do being the larger party and all.

Secondly, the CP holds the minister of defence position. This is in violation of the "codemnation of the CP" terms. stating that the CP should not hold the MoD position for twenty years.

also, dont think that calling me "immature" will do anything. Leave the mud slinging for little children at school please.

Date22:44:01, December 20, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageWhy should the CP be included at all?

Date22:46:29, December 20, 2007 CET
FromModerate Kafuri Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageDespite their views, they are still the second largest party. It is not of our choosing but of the peoples. The larger parties deserve more representation than smaller parties. The Cabient is no longer choosing who will best serve the country it appears as it is no who will best serve a parties interest.

Date22:49:25, December 20, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageHaven't you noticed yet? The people are idiots. The cabinet positions are not elected positions, so their opinions are irrelevant. Any cabinet that is possible to pass is an acceptable cabinet.

Date23:01:39, December 20, 2007 CET
FromModerate Kafuri Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageSince the people give you representation in the Kafuri goverment, I wouldnt suggest not calling them idiots. Also, it is very relevant the people opinion.

As for your third point, some of the best cabients in political history are ones that have a well diversified political outlook.

Date23:03:57, December 20, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageThey can't hear what I say here.

No, it's not. The cabinets are up to us.

Some of the best cabinets in Kafuristani history? I think not.

Date23:05:09, December 20, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessagePropose your own cabinet.

Date23:06:28, December 20, 2007 CET
FromModerate Kafuri Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageSo, you say that only one party should control the entire cabinet for best results? I honestly could live with that.

Date23:09:22, December 20, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageSure, if they can get it to pass.

But that won't happen often. So, see what I said about who should be in a cabinet earlier.

Date23:21:17, December 20, 2007 CET
FromModerate Kafuri Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageTaking your advice I proposed my own cabinet.

Date05:53:18, December 21, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (September 2503)
MessageMKP, this isn't about including the largest parties; this is about forming a cabinet with the smallest number of parties. Desperate solutions I am afraid...damn I hate the seats arrangement.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 307

no
       

Total Seats: 408

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy".

    Random quote: "Difference of religion breeds more quarrels than difference of politics." - Wendell Phillips

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71