We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Traditional Values Reality Check
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alorian Free Democrats
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2504
Description[?]:
Just because some parties see fit to dub several of their values "traditional" doesn't mean that they are right, valuable or desirable at all. This bill is a reversal of some poor policy that passed recently. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Policy concerning industrial hemp.
Old value:: Industrial hemp regulations are left up to local governments.
Current: Only regulated agribusinesses may produce industrial hemp.
Proposed: There are no regulations on industrial hemp.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Current: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Proposed: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:42:01, December 20, 2007 CET | From | People's Reform Party | To | Debating the Traditional Values Reality Check |
Message | It's ILLEGAL! AFD just abstained in last voting, and now they want to recover what we changed. |
Date | 15:48:58, December 20, 2007 CET | From | Alorian Free Democrats | To | Debating the Traditional Values Reality Check |
Message | And exactly what is illegal about this? |
Date | 21:31:54, December 20, 2007 CET | From | Stance for Alorian Justice | To | Debating the Traditional Values Reality Check |
Message | We cannot support Artciles 2 and 3 and thus cannot support this bill. However We would be happy to suport Article 1 if it were proposed as a separate legislation. |
Date | 05:52:41, December 21, 2007 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Traditional Values Reality Check |
Message | We've thought about it, and we now believe that this legislation is more worthy of passage. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 381 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 214 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 105 |
Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks |