We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pre-School Education Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Tukarali Graenix Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2507
Description[?]:
Seeing as the largest age group of our nation (and each individual tribe) is the 0-5 group, the government should be more involved in the education of our future workforce and leaders. This bill is open to change in the proposal, but I feel that it should not be the current one. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Pre-school education.
Old value:: The government leaves the pre-school education policy to local governments.
Current: The government maintains a system of free publically owned nurseries alongside unregulated private establishments.
Proposed: The government maintains a system of free publically owned nursery and pre-school educational centres.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:04:54, December 23, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Pre-School Education Reform |
Message | We'll support |
Date | 08:58:50, December 24, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Pre-School Education Reform |
Message | We oppose. Pre-school education is not sufficiently important to the welfare of the whole of the nation to restrict the authority of the local governments. |
Date | 14:31:30, December 24, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Pre-School Education Reform |
Message | Not sufficiently important JUP? Due to that statement, we'll support for that statement is idiotic. |
Date | 18:45:10, December 24, 2007 CET | From | Monacelli Party | To | Debating the Pre-School Education Reform |
Message | although we see JUP's stand on allowing local govts to decide bc it would just put one more chip in the federal lap, we would lean towards supporting this one so as to set the bar nationally for pre-school education. As well as removing the burden of funding on local governments. |
Date | 20:38:42, December 24, 2007 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the Pre-School Education Reform |
Message | It's not sufficiently important? As I've stated, the largest group of our citizens fall into the 0-5 age group. I totally disagree with you, because I think that it is very important. |
Date | 22:22:48, December 24, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Pre-School Education Reform |
Message | I like to see a stat for that population figure Graenix. |
Date | 06:08:07, December 25, 2007 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Pre-School Education Reform |
Message | support. psychologically speaking the first six years of life are the most important, so it is in everyone's interest to make sure this age group is adequately provided for. |
Date | 06:17:46, December 25, 2007 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the Pre-School Education Reform |
Message | Our nation actively supports population growth and we don't discount or offer free condoms. That would indicate the population of younger citizens would grow. But besides that, if you take a look at each individual tribe's population chart you will see what I am talking about. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 320 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 179 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
Random quote: "This country has far more problems than it deserves and far more solutions than it applies." - Ralph Nader |