Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 02:04:08
Server time: 01:55:51, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Neo_kami | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Aesthetic bill 2505 "Against arbitrariness in our trade unions"

Details

Submitted by[?]: "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2505

Description[?]:

"...Honestly, who wants for example our medics to go on strike without ensuring a minimal service? Who wants the police or the firefighters to go on strike without ensuring a minimal service? And who wants our wine suppliers to go on strike without ensuring a minimal service? I don't. It is true that we need strong trade unions because strong trade unions are the condition for fair economic growth, but union arbitrariness and too much power destroys more than what it improves..."

Adam Horvitz, party leader

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:27:19, December 23, 2007 CET
From Groene ArbeidersPartij
ToDebating the Aesthetic bill 2505 "Against arbitrariness in our trade unions"
MessageWe only agree on the first article..

Date13:43:14, December 23, 2007 CET
From Democratic Socialist Union
ToDebating the Aesthetic bill 2505 "Against arbitrariness in our trade unions"
MessageAbsolutely not.

Date14:36:07, December 23, 2007 CET
From Democratic Nationalists Party
ToDebating the Aesthetic bill 2505 "Against arbitrariness in our trade unions"
MessageWe dissagree with Article 3.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 159

no
    

Total Seats: 108

abstain
 

Total Seats: 34


Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

Random quote: "No one today can afford to be innocent, or indulge himself in ignorance of contemporary governments, politics and social orders. The national polities of the modern world maintain their existence by deliberately fostered craving and fear: monstrous protection rackets. The 'free world' has become economically dependent on a fantastic system of stimulation of greed which cannot be fulfilled, sexual desire which cannot be satiated and hatred which has no outlet except against oneself, the persons one is supposed to love, or the revolutionary aspirations of pitiful, poverty-stricken marginal societies like Cuba or Vietnam. The conditions of the Cold War have turned all modern societies - communist included - into vicious distorters of man's true potential." - Gary Snyder

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64