Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 00:22:09
Server time: 11:37:50, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Brazil25 | FireboyUK | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Urban Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2506

Description[?]:

...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:06:32, December 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageKSP and KPP, either you accept it or witness the last cabinet formation that includes you.
You want to be foreign minister to work on the UMR, acceptable.
KPP, you seem to be fine with just one position; if any of you deny, i shall not tolerate your behavior.

Date09:19:19, December 25, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageWell, I would've voted for this, but talking about your "tolerance" of our behavior annoys me. This nation isn't a dictatorship where all other parties exist because you allow them to. We have the right to vote however we wish, regardless of your feelings on the issue. Just as you have the right to propose whatever cabinet formations you want. You seem to assume you will be the most powerful party forever.

OOC: Don't bother with sending any troops to Kuchifey, there have been too many civil wars on Terra recently, I'm not interested in another one. You'll be ignored.

Date09:24:28, December 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageOOC: I am not going to.

I am giving you the position of FA simply because you want to work on the UMR. You yourself said you were mainly interested in that position. As you wish. I hate the whole cabinet proposals procedure, and due to general disagreement, I do not wish any more arguments.

Date09:26:18, December 25, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageI have no problem with the cabinet. As I said, I would've voted for it, if you'd kept your mouth shut.

Date09:29:35, December 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageYou misunderstood me; I shall 'not tolerate your behavior' because, over the last years, we seemed to have a strong disagreement over cabinet formations, therefore i could not take another failed proposal. I didn't mean I am the most powerful party and do whatever I want and hate your objections. Perhaps I stated my opinion in a wrong way. We seem to annoy each other so clearly forget it.

Date09:32:25, December 25, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
Message"we seem to annoy each other".

Really? I hadn't noticed.

:)

Date09:34:42, December 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageIt is so odd that we didn't destroy Kafuristan over arguments

Date09:39:52, December 25, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageIndeed.

We used to get along. Until the NAPs attempted civil war, where you got mad at me for wanting to kick the RGP out of the KLC because they were unwilling to defend themselves or their allies or to at least let the KPP and I do it.

It's been all down hill since then.

Date09:41:50, December 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageYes, those were the times of George S.K. Where did those times disappear? Shouldn't we attempt to close up again?

Date09:43:03, December 25, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageHow would we do that?

Date09:45:23, December 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageI have no idea...the gap between us seems so big. If we two unite, Kafuristan shall become automatically united. Then we can work on being a great power.

Date09:50:34, December 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageI still vote in favor of this; if you disregard my messages and accept my apology, then i shall kindly ask you to vote in favor as well.

Date09:51:14, December 25, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageEh, whatever.

Date09:52:23, December 25, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageI hate voting for a cabinet with some much conservative in it though. Ugh. I feel unclean.

Date09:53:09, December 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageWe cannot leave the CP, as being the 2nd largest party, out.

Date09:54:53, December 25, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageYes, we can. Who cares how many seats they have if they're not parties that share any positions with you.

Well, don't share any with me at least. Except maybe being pro-strong military.

Date09:56:28, December 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal (April 2506)
MessageI considered this and please, have a look in my cabinet proposals that are set on debate phase.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 472

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 243


    Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation.

    Random quote: "Under every stone lurks a politician." Aristophanes (450 BC - 388 BC), Thesmophoriazusae, 410 B.C

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 68