Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5473
Next month in: 02:03:36
Server time: 09:56:23, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Nileowen_Kir | Ost | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Freedom Bill (2508)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2509

Description[?]:

We believe that Sekowo is currently too restrictive religiously, and we would like to restore religious freedom to Sekowo.

We have endeavored to set this bill up as a sort of compromise.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:05:22, December 29, 2007 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Bill (2508)
MessageArticle 1
We're split, we would like to keep a close watch on them, however we don't see a reason they should go through extra steps of registering being a misionary, when that would already have been found out upon there entering the country.

Article 2
No. Religions should not be given exemptions, especially since they have a long history of abusing them.

Article 3
Never!

Date03:31:46, December 30, 2007 CET
From Sekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Bill (2508)
MessageWe are opposed to all three articles.

Date12:13:48, December 30, 2007 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Bill (2508)
MessageDSP: This (article 3) would be the same as with other corporations.

Date16:28:03, December 30, 2007 CET
From Revolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Bill (2508)
MessageWe might have the different people see the articles differently thing, as some of your replies do not make sence to me...)

Anywho, we shall never stand for the article dealing with public officals.

As it is, finding middle ground on the tax issue is good enough for a compromise we feel.

Date17:27:51, December 30, 2007 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Bill (2508)
MessageNPP:
Article 3 is about public officials and religious things.

Date09:19:23, December 31, 2007 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Bill (2508)
MessageWe meant the one about taxes.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 291

no
  

Total Seats: 271

abstain
   

Total Seats: 188


Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Random quote: "If gays are granted rights, next we'll have to give rights to prostitutes and to people who sleep with St. Bernards and to nailbiters." - Anita Bryant

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67