Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 02:10:50
Server time: 13:49:09, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom of Religion Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2510

Description[?]:

A tax of 10% of all earnings be submitted for the purpose of maintaining of churches, church related activities and all personnel related to said churches and activities.
To ensure a fair and equitable distribution, a special Office of Religion within the Finance Ministry be established to disburse the monies according to each church denomination according to the most recent census.
Whereas, some people may elect not to have their taxes garnished at the rate 10% for the use of churches, church related activities and all personnel related to said churches and activities may get an exemption if said people can prove to the satisfaction of the Finance Ministry that 10% of their income for the previous year had be spent on humanitarian causes and organizations as recognized by the United Kingdom of Beluzia and Bailon.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:53:42, December 30, 2007 CET
FromUnited Sizpoao Comrade RevolutionRedArmy
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageDont want

Date15:31:49, December 30, 2007 CET
FromProtectorate Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageWhy not? Do you not think that the people of the Kingdom have the right and the responsibility to help those that are less well off than others? One would think that the USCRA would be interested in this bill. With your wide support, I am sure that that many would opt for the exemption. That money would still be used to the betterment of the entire nation. How could any party argue against that?

Date18:37:40, December 30, 2007 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageThis wont help your visibility mate.

Date23:45:19, December 30, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageYou'll need proposals. Add a few proposals to the bill.

Date11:16:05, January 01, 2008 CET
FromUnited Sizpoao Comrade RevolutionRedArmy
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
Messageerm...if that money is for people benefit, then i would let it go

Date14:22:25, January 01, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageWe have already ratified that treaty...

Date17:47:30, January 01, 2008 CET
FromNeo-Marxist revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
Message@WP: They're talking about withdrawing.

Date19:27:19, January 01, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageTreaties weaken Beluzia!

Date20:26:06, January 01, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
Messagemy apologies...

Date20:26:55, January 01, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageThe Captain thinks that we stand to lose much money by withdrawing!

Date21:53:18, January 01, 2008 CET
FromProtectorate Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageBy withdrawing, the nation has the ability to promote and protect both the workers and the industry of this great land

Date23:31:21, January 01, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageBut we will lose free trade with that nation...

Date04:15:33, January 02, 2008 CET
FromProtectorate Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageBut which is better, buying products from our own people or from foreigners? I would hope that your patriotism would be better than that.

Date04:25:29, January 02, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Act
MessageDo not question my loyalty to this nation! I simply want to point out the benefits of free trade between our nations. Beluzian products are the envy of the modern world! Our people would always choose Beluzian products over foreign goods. Perhaps we shall vote for the withdrawal in order to show good will to our new friends of the Protectorate Party.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 434

no
 

Total Seats: 93

abstain
  

Total Seats: 223


Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that.

Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70