Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 02:27:16
Server time: 13:32:43, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Brazil25 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: JDW Tukarali Greens Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2510

Description[?]:

modest increase in total number and in quota of bills a party can introduce.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:54:55, December 30, 2007 CET
FromJDW Tukarali Greens Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
Messagethis gives parties more oportunities to propose legislation if they so wish.

who could be opposed to that?

Date13:59:10, December 30, 2007 CET
FromJDW Tukarali Greens Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
Messageadded proposal/article to make it more likely any bill being voted on
actually is resolved without being returned to debate.

Date15:08:16, December 30, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageOk. Let me take this one article at a time.

Article 1: We'll support.

Article 2: We'll support but we would love to see it even with the per year amendment

Article 3: Fully oppose. We prefer the three year line and not the 4 year line.

Date17:06:00, December 30, 2007 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageCould support article 1 and 2. Opposed to article 3, 48 months (=8 RL days) is too long, we prefer the current period of 36 months (6 RL days), although we might be willing to compromise around.42 (=7days) if people could live with that.

Date20:35:41, December 30, 2007 CET
FromTukarali Graenix Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageOh hell no. I will not support any additional time added to the term length. The first two articles are fine.

Date20:46:14, December 30, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageI have no problem with a 7 day limit. That way, we will know when the elections will be held.

Date23:55:45, December 30, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageWe oppose this bill in its entirety.

Date05:32:18, December 31, 2007 CET
FromTukarali Graenix Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageWe should actually think about shortening the term. This would put pressure on all of the parties to actually propose bills and put work in.

Date14:37:08, December 31, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageBut shortening themm would limit what the government can do in the time that we do have.

Date18:18:32, December 31, 2007 CET
FromTukarali Graenix Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageHow many months go by when no new bills are proposed? Of course the time would be limited, meaining more gets done in the shorter time that we have

Date03:08:45, January 01, 2008 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageThe bills still get reset after the election and we lose a day and a half when the election year hits.

Date07:53:40, January 01, 2008 CET
FromJDW Tukarali Greens Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
Messageremoved article three which was the main cause of opposition

Date21:24:51, January 01, 2008 CET
FromTukarali Graenix Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageSupport now.

Date00:52:26, January 02, 2008 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageAnd as usual, it fails because both the JUP and the SV fail to understand that five bills a month and 10 bills a year does not hike up activity but reduces it.

Date05:31:44, January 02, 2008 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageWe are glad one other party understands the issues and votes against these bills with us.

Date07:49:17, January 04, 2008 CET
FromJDW Tukarali Greens Party
ToDebating the More Bills to Propose and More Chance to Actually Vote On Them bill
MessageShaman's Voice - good riddance


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 192

no
  

Total Seats: 203

abstain
  

Total Seats: 104


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character." - Martin Luther King Jr.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76