Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 03:09:59
Server time: 16:50:00, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): hyraemous | itsjustgav | saintstiiizy | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2509

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Kafuristan

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2509

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:05:29, December 30, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
MessageBoo.

Date09:20:53, December 31, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
MessageKSP needs to handle FA right now, due to our matters regarding the UMR.

Date14:15:35, December 31, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
Messagebah - to hell with the KSP

Date18:18:23, December 31, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
Message:)

Date18:33:17, December 31, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
MessageWell, it shall be up to CPK to handle Kafuristan; just leave KSP managing the FA Ministry.

Date18:33:29, December 31, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Urban Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
MessageThe LUP shall fall soon...

Date20:01:22, December 31, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
MessageOOC: Changing your name/style again?

Date21:01:14, December 31, 2007 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
MessageThe NRPK is barely active. Why would you give them seats?

Date22:21:15, December 31, 2007 CET
FromRepublican Party of Kafuristan (KRC)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
MessageBecause we have the third-highest seat count.

Date00:16:32, January 01, 2008 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
MessageBut would you be able to do anything?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 247

no
     

Total Seats: 396

abstain
 

Total Seats: 72


Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

Random quote: "If you have an apple, and I have an apple, and we exchange the apples, then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea, and I have an idea, and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas." - George Bernard Shaw

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61