We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2509
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Kafuristan
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2509
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Conservative Party of Kafuristan
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Conservative Party of Kafuristan
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Republican Party of Kafuristan (KRC)
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Republican Party of Kafuristan (KRC)
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Conservative Party of Kafuristan
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Republican Party of Kafuristan (KRC)
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Conservative Party of Kafuristan
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Republican Party of Kafuristan (KRC)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:05:29, December 30, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | Boo. |
Date | 09:20:53, December 31, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | KSP needs to handle FA right now, due to our matters regarding the UMR. |
Date | 14:15:35, December 31, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | bah - to hell with the KSP |
Date | 18:18:23, December 31, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | :) |
Date | 18:33:17, December 31, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | Well, it shall be up to CPK to handle Kafuristan; just leave KSP managing the FA Ministry. |
Date | 18:33:29, December 31, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | The LUP shall fall soon... |
Date | 20:01:22, December 31, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | OOC: Changing your name/style again? |
Date | 21:01:14, December 31, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | The NRPK is barely active. Why would you give them seats? |
Date | 22:21:15, December 31, 2007 CET | From | Republican Party of Kafuristan (KRC) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | Because we have the third-highest seat count. |
Date | 00:16:32, January 01, 2008 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2509 |
Message | But would you be able to do anything? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 247 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 396 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 72 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "If you have an apple, and I have an apple, and we exchange the apples, then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea, and I have an idea, and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas." - George Bernard Shaw |