Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 03:09:42
Server time: 12:50:17, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): echizen | Mbites2 | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National reform 3

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Sizpoao Comrade RevolutionRedArmy

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2510

Description[?]:

Mahatma Gandhi will be assumed as Independent leader who against imperialism

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:53:14, December 31, 2007 CET
FromNeo-Marxist revolutionary Party
ToDebating the National reform 3
MessageThis isn't Earth.

Date17:51:26, December 31, 2007 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the National reform 3
MessageWho on Terra is Mahatma Gandhi? sounds like a Rutanian name to me!!!!

Date19:13:06, December 31, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the National reform 3
Messageooc: He was wimpy and drank his own urine. True warriors like hindutva and sikh extremists helped to kill Ghandi for his weakness!

Bic: Yar Har Har!

Date19:20:44, December 31, 2007 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the National reform 3
Message(ooc - i know who he is really but we need to stay in character as much as possible, I would ask the United Sizpoao Communist Red Army to refrain from mentioning real life examples in their posts and bills.)

Date20:52:25, December 31, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the National reform 3
Messageooc: lets not be TOO rules minded, please. The fun part of the game is the opportunity to discuss and debate. Referencing game rules is no more IC than Mentioning real world events and personages, and is far more detrimental to fun IMO.

Of course there are situations where abuse occurs, and that is what we have the mods for, but I think this is nowhere near that direction.

In short I would vastly prefer discussing Gandhi as opposed to the RP rules.

Date21:38:29, December 31, 2007 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the National reform 3
MessageI will quite happily discuss it, but we dont need legislation based around it. Can the United Sizpoao Communist Red Army please refrain from posting bills about real world issues? I have no prob;em with any individuals, and would not even consider taking this to the Mods. We simply want the RP to take a natural course rather than the real world. If the United Sizpoao Communist Red Army would like to discuss real world issues they can use the "OOC" for out of character, and "IC" for In character. :)

Date11:58:11, January 01, 2008 CET
FromUnited Sizpoao Comrade RevolutionRedArmy
ToDebating the National reform 3
Messageok ok

Date14:26:02, January 01, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the National reform 3
Messageour thanks :)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 236

no
     

Total Seats: 459

abstain
 

Total Seats: 55


Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

Random quote: "How we can possibly be giving £1bn a month, when we're in this sort of debt, to Bongo Bongo Land is completely beyond me." - Godfrey Bloom

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59