Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 03:05:24
Server time: 16:54:35, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Caoimhean | hyraemous | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Ethical Defense Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Classical Reform Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2510

Description[?]:

Just as our government has no right to inflict undue pain and suffering upon its citizens, it has no right to inflict undue pain and suffering upon the citizens of other countries. Biological, chemical, or nuclear weapons are dangerous, volatile weapons that cannot be used unless absolutely necessary. Additionally, our intelligence agency must be restricted from operations such as destruction of foreign infrastructure, assassination of foreign or domestic citizens, and the dispersal of misinformation amongst foreign and domestic citizens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:11:42, January 01, 2008 CET
From Anarcho-Capitalist Party
ToDebating the The Ethical Defense Bill
MessageWe like having our options open.

Date13:39:48, January 01, 2008 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the The Ethical Defense Bill
MessageAs do we, we oppose this bill.

We especially oppose articles 3 and 4 which limit Rutania's ability to defend itself.

Date21:08:55, January 01, 2008 CET
From Classical Reform Party
ToDebating the The Ethical Defense Bill
MessageThe Classical Reform Party is distressed by the apparent lack of regard for foreign citizens expressed by both the Anarcho-Capitalist Party and the Freedom Party.

Date22:08:25, January 01, 2008 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the The Ethical Defense Bill
MessageHardly. The CRP is showing their complete disregard for the citizens of Rutania. Should a foreign power nuke us repeatedly, the CRP would have the government restricted to not responding at all and just allowing our citizens to die until "victory is not feasible by any other means", which is vague and ridiculous.

Keeping the threat open that we will nuke any nation that attacks us ensures our defence.


Date02:44:27, January 02, 2008 CET
From Classical Reform Party
ToDebating the The Ethical Defense Bill
MessageA doctrine of mutually assured destruction with regards to nuclear war does nothing but ensure that destruction.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
     

Total Seats: 425

abstain
   

Total Seats: 135


Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

Random quote: "I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes." - Winston Churchill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71