Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:06:15
Server time: 17:53:44, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Administration Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2510

Description[?]:

An act to restructuring the Administration system of the empire.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:17:16, January 01, 2008 CET
From Social Progressive Union
ToDebating the Administration Act
MessageWhy do we need reduce parliamentry seats? Minority rules the Majority? That's absurd!

Date12:55:48, January 01, 2008 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Administration Act
MessageThere is no articles that say anything about reducing the parliamentary seats here and the proposal algorithm will gives a very small advantage to larger regions with larger population.

- Martin Dresden
Head of the Pontesian Imperial Movement

Date14:43:23, January 01, 2008 CET
From One Nation Conservative Party
ToDebating the Administration Act
MessageWe will vote in favour of articles 3 and 4 only.

Date15:57:50, January 01, 2008 CET
From Christian Fascist Party
ToDebating the Administration Act
MessageWe will not voet in favor due to 2

Date17:14:34, January 01, 2008 CET
From One Nation Conservative Party
ToDebating the Administration Act
MessageApologies, I meant we will only vote in favour of article 1 and 4.

Date04:00:30, January 02, 2008 CET
From Wessex High Imperial Party
ToDebating the Administration Act
MessageWe are in favor of articles one and two.

Date15:30:47, January 02, 2008 CET
From The Hodirak'hi Workers Party
ToDebating the Administration Act
Messagearticle 3 is wrong,
hodirakhi will not have a fair say due to their size!!!!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 121

no
    

Total Seats: 109

abstain
  

Total Seats: 95


Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

Random quote: "Up against the corporate government, voters find themselves asked to choose between look-alike candidates from two parties vying to see who takes the marching orders from their campaign paymasters and their future employers. The money of vested interest nullifies genuine voter choice and trust." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 83