We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Administration Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2510
Description[?]:
An act to restructuring the Administration system of the empire. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is granted based on race/religion/gender.
Current: Citizenship is gained by passing a qualifying exam.
Proposed: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting nationality (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights).
Old value:: Only those born to nationals become nationals.
Current: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Proposed: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The method used to determine the number of seats each region receives in the national legislature.
Old value:: Equal representation, regardless of region population.
Current: Equal representation, regardless of region population.
Proposed: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:17:16, January 01, 2008 CET | From | Social Progressive Union | To | Debating the Administration Act |
Message | Why do we need reduce parliamentry seats? Minority rules the Majority? That's absurd! |
Date | 12:55:48, January 01, 2008 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Administration Act |
Message | There is no articles that say anything about reducing the parliamentary seats here and the proposal algorithm will gives a very small advantage to larger regions with larger population. - Martin Dresden Head of the Pontesian Imperial Movement |
Date | 14:43:23, January 01, 2008 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Administration Act |
Message | We will vote in favour of articles 3 and 4 only. |
Date | 15:57:50, January 01, 2008 CET | From | Christian Fascist Party | To | Debating the Administration Act |
Message | We will not voet in favor due to 2 |
Date | 17:14:34, January 01, 2008 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Administration Act |
Message | Apologies, I meant we will only vote in favour of article 1 and 4. |
Date | 04:00:30, January 02, 2008 CET | From | Wessex High Imperial Party | To | Debating the Administration Act |
Message | We are in favor of articles one and two. |
Date | 15:30:47, January 02, 2008 CET | From | The Hodirak'hi Workers Party | To | Debating the Administration Act |
Message | article 3 is wrong, hodirakhi will not have a fair say due to their size!!!! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 121 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 109 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 95 |
Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
Random quote: "Up against the corporate government, voters find themselves asked to choose between look-alike candidates from two parties vying to see who takes the marching orders from their campaign paymasters and their future employers. The money of vested interest nullifies genuine voter choice and trust." - Ralph Nader |