Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 02:03:39
Server time: 13:56:20, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): HopesFor | Tayes3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2510

Description[?]:

OOC: As per requested by SPU who is having problem understanding particracy.

Article 13

The responsibilites of Homeland Security will be conducted by the Democratic Workers Party

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:19:49, January 01, 2008 CET
FromSocial Progressive Union
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)
MessageWe don't have any reasons to oppose this proposal, so "aye"

Date06:27:12, January 01, 2008 CET
FromNrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)
MessageWe're naturally aganist this cabinet proposal.

- Martin Dresden
Head of the Pontesian Imperial Movement

OOC: I hope that the party that become the new cabinet will continue RP with Beitenyu. If you have any question about the situation than don't hesitate to telegram me.

Date14:22:13, January 01, 2008 CET
FromOne Nation Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)
MessageOur greatest glory is not to never stare failure in the eye but to ensure we rise up everytime we fail. This cabinet will ensure Pontesi enters an era of forgotten glories and the resulting destruction of our heritage in the name of liberal standardisation and blandness.

Date20:53:27, January 01, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)
MessageThis cabinet will ensure peace and prosperity.

Date02:13:30, January 02, 2008 CET
FromWessex High Imperial Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)
MessageOOC: Very kind of PIM to post this for the SPU.

Date02:18:17, January 02, 2008 CET
FromNrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)
MessageWe believe that the only thing that the DWP want is the same thing that the black movement have done before. We urge all party not to join this cabinet coaltion and to create a national cabinet that consist of all parties that will counter the foreign threat to the empire.

- Martin Dresden
Head of the Pontesian Imperial Movement

Date02:24:11, January 02, 2008 CET
FromWessex High Imperial Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)
MessageAlthough we are very pleased that we are part of the new cabinet proposal here, and we agree that the current cabinet must be replaced, WHIP shares our cousin's concerns regarding our Empire's defenses and also recognizes the need to have a more seasoned Head of Government at this time of national threat. We will therefore suggest another version of a cabinet that may be a bit more of a compromise. If we can agree, then vote yes on WHIP's cabinet proposal. If there is no agreement, WHIP will have to vote yes on this cabinet proposal according to our political philosophies.

-- Ialia d'Erridu, Protector of Wessex

Date03:15:21, January 02, 2008 CET
FromWessex High Imperial Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)
MessageSince the cabinet WHIP proposed has been rejected by the SDP, and it is imperative that we replace our current cabinet--of the two remaining proposals for new cabinets, we find the one proposed by the SDP to be the wiser choice at present and will therefore vote against this cabinet proposal in favor of the other one.

-- Ialia d'Erridu, Protector of Wessex

Date03:52:44, January 02, 2008 CET
FromWessex High Imperial Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2509 (SPU request)
MessageAfter reexamining our position on this matter, as a safeguard, we will vote in favor of this cabinet--but WHIP must go on record that we are a party that fundamentally places education before all else. We do, however, trust the SDP to oversee education well and therefore will not oppose this

-- Her Highness Ialia d'Erridu, Protector of Wessex

Long Live Her Majesty

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 173

no
    

Total Seats: 113

abstain
 

Total Seats: 39


Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: "Hatred is gained as much by good works as by evil." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70