Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 03:23:15
Server time: 16:36:44, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | Lab47AU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Olympic Hosting Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2105

Description[?]:

By the passage of this bill, the Senate approves the province of Lindar Valley to be the first host of the modern Olympic Games.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:24:40, September 02, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Olympic Hosting Act
MessageOOC: Things are starting to get a roll on, Olympicswise. Again, I ask disinterested parties to please abstain or vote for, if youre feeling nice. Ive put this straight to vote as time is of the essence.

IC: The modern Olympics will first return to its homeworld before being sent abroad.

Date11:27:36, September 02, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Olympic Hosting Act
MessageForgot to mention, the Olympics are coming in 2115.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
        

Total Seats: 441

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 13


    Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

    Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 38