Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 03:31:23
Server time: 08:28:36, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of June 2510

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Nationalist Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2512

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:38:27, January 02, 2008 CET
FromKaitite Movement
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2510
MessageThe prophet asks that your other cabinet proposal be removed from the table before we examine this one.

Date05:53:14, January 03, 2008 CET
FromFree Peoples Revolutionary Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2510
MessageI liked the other one better :) but anyway

Date06:15:22, January 03, 2008 CET
FromKaitite Movement
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2510
MessageWe thank the CNF and will consider this proposal carefully.

Date07:21:55, January 03, 2008 CET
FromNew Conservative Party of Malivia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2510
MessageThe NCPM will not accept this cabinet.

Date09:30:11, January 03, 2008 CET
FromSupporters of Science in Design (IP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2510
MessageUntil the Conservative Nationalist Front begins following the Acceptable Legislative Conduct Act, my party's stance is that it is not responsible enough to be in the government. We, therefore, oppose this cabinet.

-Joseph Hunter,
Ouparath,
Chairman of the Supporters of Science in Design

Date23:04:40, January 03, 2008 CET
FromThe Federalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2510
MessageAs the Federalist Party has no seats in this resolution, we will not support it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 299

no
     

Total Seats: 451

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

    Random quote: "We here thank those in Deltaria who put [Zardic spy Mona Rivet] to justice in the most humane way possible. With bullets." - Sergio Rodriguez, former Egelian journalist

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 77