We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Security
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2511
Description[?]:
Why should we waste money in having a police force when we have soldiers laying around in the barracks doing nothing |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:05:18, January 03, 2008 CET | From | Old Conservative Party | To | Debating the Security |
Message | Hey can you alternate article 1 a little bit. Then you have my vote. |
Date | 07:10:49, January 03, 2008 CET | From | National Socialist Party | To | Debating the Security |
Message | how do you want it to be transformed |
Date | 15:47:52, January 03, 2008 CET | From | Old Conservative Party | To | Debating the Security |
Message | Hmmm... Well, [A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.] I think is pretty good. Not to dictator like but at the same time possesses power. THoughts? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 184 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 37 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 76 |
Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator. |
Random quote: "Global warming is indeed a scam, perpetrated by scientists with vested interests, but in need of crash courses in geology, logic and the philosophy of science." - Dr. Martin Keeley |