We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Plurality Party Act of 2511 III
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2512
Description[?]:
| Plurality Party Act of 2511 III |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The National Animal.
Old value:: Alorian Lion
Current: Alorian Lion
Proposed: None.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:26:09, January 04, 2008 CET | From | People's Reform Party | To | Debating the Plurality Party Act of 2511 III |
| Message | Stop MLP from destroying our tradition! |
| Date | 20:17:25, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Alorian Free Democrats | To | Debating the Plurality Party Act of 2511 III |
| Message | It's not even actual tradition. |
| Date | 00:05:24, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Rationalists (PrCoa) | To | Debating the Plurality Party Act of 2511 III |
| Message | Yes it is. |
| Date | 05:57:17, January 05, 2008 CET | From |  Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Plurality Party Act of 2511 III |
| Message | Nope. Country didn't start-out with a national animal. And it's been repealed before, and replaced with nothing. As far as "tradition" goes, actually holding the plurality of seats in parliament for the past 80+ years goes to show what the people want: the MLP. When was the last time you held the presidency or the bulk of seats in the national legislature, PRP? Face it, your party isn't relevant to the Alorian people. |
| Date | 09:26:56, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Plurality Party Act of 2511 III |
| Message | Coula anyone tell us why we should vote YES or NO. The problem with this bill is that it doesn't offer any explanation as to why it should be eliminated. Seeing that some of you seem to have participated in the vote for the creation of a national animal years ago, you should give a historical background as to why it was approved before and other necessary details. |
| Date | 09:27:24, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Plurality Party Act of 2511 III |
| Message | REVISED: Could anyone tell us why we should vote YES or NO? The problem with this bill is that it doesn't offer any explanation as to why it should be eliminated. Seeing that some of you seem to have participated in the vote for the creation of a national animal years ago, you should give a historical background as to why it was approved before and other necessary details. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 255 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 418 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 27 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle |