We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2511
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christliche Demokratie
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2512
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Christliche Demokratie
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Revolutionary Socialist Front
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the National Red Star Movement
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Christliche Demokratie
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Revolutionary Socialist Front
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the National Red Star Movement
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Revolutionary Socialist Front
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Christliche Demokratie
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the National Red Star Movement
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Revolutionary Socialist Front
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Revolutionary Socialist Front
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the National Red Star Movement
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Christliche Demokratie
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:37:27, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Christian Communist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2511 |
Message | If the RSF supports this we will withdraw our support of their candidate for Archon next election |
Date | 01:49:42, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Christliche Demokratie | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2511 |
Message | If the RSF falls for that one then the CCP must really have them wipped. |
Date | 01:51:14, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Christliche Demokratie | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2511 |
Message | And besides for the sake of the RSF the NRM have much more in common, than a religious conservative party such as yours. |
Date | 02:58:24, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Christian Communist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2511 |
Message | Our candidate won 12% in the first round and the RSF won 60% in the second. Without our support they risk falling under 50% in the second round. |
Date | 03:02:42, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Christian Communist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2511 |
Message | And furthermore we'd contend the RSF our closer to our position than that of the CD, who are religious as well but not socialists. In the end we like the RSF and NRSM favour the creation of a socialist state whereas the Christian Democrats do not. |
Date | 06:18:41, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary Socialist Front | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2511 |
Message | I'm flattered to see you two bicker over me, but CD, unless I am actually gaining something there is no reason for me to vote for your proposal as it has no inherent merit of its own. I now have a larger share of the vote, so if you want me to agree to your cabinet proposal you'd want to throw in another seat for me. Otherwise I see no reason to change the status quo. |
Date | 22:32:24, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Christliche Demokratie | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2511 |
Message | The CCP has no vision of a socialist state. They are fanatical and extremely conservative. Why should we be in alliance with them? They bear the greatest earmarks of the far right? I thought Revolutionary Socialist would mean something else. Perhaps as strongly anti reactionary? Well that's all CCP is the your doctrine. They taint your doctrine, they are not communist. But we don't support a coalition with them for the sake of differences coming to moral reform of the nation, most of which the CCP has velemently opposed. And instead I picked another party which both us have a more common record with. The NRSM. We will propose another cabinet proposal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 101 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 220 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 179 |
Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way. |
Random quote: "History is made by angry minorities, not by passive majorities." - Fareed Zakaria |