We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Acte D'Autorité D'Église
Details
Submitted by[?]: Parti Communiste de Rildanor
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2512
Description[?]:
| Church Authority Act Restoring authority to our Orthodox Church. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's intervention in the appointment of ministers of religion.
Old value:: The state does not intervene in the appointment of ministers of any religion whatsoever.
Current: The state does not intervene in the appointment of ministers of any religion whatsoever.
Proposed: The state appoints the head and ministers of the state religion, but does not intervene otherwise.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Remuneration of ministers of religion.
Old value:: The state does not intervene in the remuneration of ministers of religion.
Current: Ministers of religion shall receive no remuneration whatsoever.
Proposed: The salaries and pensions of ministers of religion shall be borne by the state and regulated by the law.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:00:23, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Option Citoyenne | To | Debating the Acte D'Autorité D'Église |
| Message | Certainly, let us assert the State's rightful authority over the superstition that calls itself a church. We will support the first two articles if the third is removed. |
| Date | 21:20:14, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Front Nationaliste Royaliste | To | Debating the Acte D'Autorité D'Église |
| Message | We shall support Articles 2 and 3 only if there is guaranteed income equality for Catholics, Protestants, and Jews and a lesser income for Moslems and other vermin. |
| Date | 21:21:05, January 05, 2008 CET | From |  Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Acte D'Autorité D'Église |
| Message | The Second Estate is increasingly worried about the growing influence of the Church in state affairs and in areas that should be the territory of the aristocracy. We cannot, therefore, support an even greater state sponsorship of the Church. |
| Date | 05:26:22, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Parti Communiste de Rildanor | To | Debating the Acte D'Autorité D'Église |
| Message | I think the FNR's point is valid, and would be covered under the present law. |
| Date | 21:30:06, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Option Citoyenne | To | Debating the Acte D'Autorité D'Église |
| Message | ooc: You should pass a law saying that, then, you have the votes to pass it. I really think the law has to be what the bill says. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 163 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 140 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation. |
| Random quote: "Socialists like to tout their confiscation and redistribution schemes as noble and caring, but we should ask if theft is ever noble or caring." - Robert Hawes |