Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 00:44:36
Server time: 11:15:23, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Dioskouros | Temitayo | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Roads and Government Works Act of 2512

Details

Submitted by[?]: Démocrates de la Gauche

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2513

Description[?]:

Article 1
Click here to remove this proposal.

Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.

Old value:: The government may not seize private property.

Current: The government may not seize private property.

Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:37:37, January 07, 2008 CET
FromCentre Démocratique
ToDebating the The Roads and Government Works Act of 2512
MessageGovernment needs to respect the rights of private property owners.

Date02:00:16, January 08, 2008 CET
FromDémocrates de la Gauche
ToDebating the The Roads and Government Works Act of 2512
MessageBut for major government works like road and highway building there should be an exemption and for improving the overall health of the community and getting compensation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 160

no
    

Total Seats: 278

abstain
 

Total Seats: 63


Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "Capitalism and communism stand at opposite poles. Their essential difference is this: the communist, seeing the rich man and his fine home, says: 'No man should have so much.' The capitalist, seeing the same thing, says: 'All men should have as much.'" - Phelps Adams

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48