Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 00:29:28
Server time: 07:30:31, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Demand for Land Redistribution.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Sekowo

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2513

Description[?]:

WIth vast holding of land in the hands of a oligarch of multinationals and lafundistas we demand that we, the peasantry who toil under the hot sun, get our fair share of what is worked on rather than being bound under feudal conditions who profit needlessly for simply having title to the land..

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:43:27, January 07, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageArticle 1
Local governments are more capable of deciding farm size limits, as they know more about their land.

Article 2
GM crops provide no threat to anyone, banning them is reactionary crap.

Date07:49:51, January 07, 2008 CET
FromCommunist Party of Sekowo
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageLocal Government has not been capable which is why its being purposed here and even if the local governments are capable of dealing with the issue, then this will give them more support to know the federal government is on the side of the landless peasant movement.

The Democratic Socialist Party is standing for the land owning Elites.

Date07:58:49, January 07, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageWe do not have 'peasants' and we quite honestly find it an offensive term, and believe many farmers and others who don't live in cities would as well.

Beyond that actual farms are on the decline, as they are gradually being replaced by the more efficient and environmentally friendly vertical farm towers that are being built in Sekowo's cities.

Date08:09:28, January 07, 2008 CET
FromCommunist Party of Sekowo
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageThe Peasantry, is the class of people who work the land to produce a crop for sale on the market.

As for vertical farms, you are an acid tripped hippie.

Date08:32:15, January 07, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageThere is a bill from several decades ago establishing urban farming, including vertical farms.

Date08:34:53, January 07, 2008 CET
FromCommunist Party of Sekowo
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageWhile we support urban farming, it is and never will be as affective as the experienced hard working peasantry. Try to raise cows in the middle of the city.

Date08:46:46, January 07, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageUrban farming, vertical farming particularly is much more successful and environmentally friendly than normal farming.

Vertical farms have the following superior qualities;
-Capability of raising over 60 acres of food in a space that only takes up 2 acres of land.
-Climate control, therefore eliminating the unpredictable and often disastrous storms and frosts.
-Year long production, vertical farms are capable of producing crops all year, rather than only 1/2 to 1/3 of the time.
-Proximity, vertical farms are located in cities and are thusly closer to the people, reducing emissions that would normally be emitted carrying the crops to the city as well as making crops fresher at the market.


While we are currently only using vertical farms to grow crops, it is quite possible to create some that chickens and cattle could roam and be raised in.

Date11:18:56, January 07, 2008 CET
FromPan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageThis attempt to limit the freedom of our hardworking agricultural sector is a disgrace.

For shame

Date11:19:21, January 07, 2008 CET
FromPan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageTho props for use of the term acid tripping hippie.

Date23:01:18, January 07, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Demand for Land Redistribution.
MessageOOC: I suggest you new parties look at the legislative history.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 127

no
      

Total Seats: 623

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: If you want to know how many players there are in Particracy right now, check out the Game Statistics buried at the bottom of the World Map screen.

    Random quote: "What we are doing to the forests of the world is but a mirror reflection of what we are doing to ourselves and to one another." - Gandhi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71