We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal Method
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pharaoh's People's Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2514
Description[?]:
A bill to change the method in which the cabinet is chosen. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:29:46, January 08, 2008 CET | From | Robot Avenging Stalinist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal Method |
Message | We support this step away from tyranny. |
Date | 14:34:33, January 08, 2008 CET | From | Ma'avak | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal Method |
Message | "We disagree. If this were to pass then the Nesí Hamdiná would simply become a figurehead and serve no real purpose, if cabinet decisions are left to him or her then it actually gives meaning to the election and encourages the formation of alliances thereby rewarding ability to work with others." -- Rosh HaMemshala Elyah Eliashiv |
Date | 17:02:30, January 08, 2008 CET | From | Robot Avenging Stalinist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal Method |
Message | Leaving the control over the cabinet to one man means that you must agree entirely with him or fail to be represented. Political ideologies always divide people if the government is being effective, we cannot let political disagreements deny proper representation. |
Date | 03:12:26, January 09, 2008 CET | From | Ma'avak | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal Method |
Message | "It does not work like that, you gain HoS by gaining nominations and you gain that through compromise and the formation of alliances. If you fail to represent those that put you in that position in the cabinet they will switch their nominations to another candidate and you will lose power over the position. It is through this law that real political coexistence is created as opposed to the "every man for himself" still of governance that would follow if this bill were to be passed." -- Rosh HaMemshala Elyah Eliashiv |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 95 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 216 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 89 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: "Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made" - Otto von Bismark |