We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kundrati Revolutionary Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2040
Description[?]:
* |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | Would the MfM be so kind and tell us why they believe this will improve our constitution? |
Date | not recorded | From | Free Market Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | I am willing to support this. |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | NO. |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | You may delete the bill, CFP and NU are voting against so you won't be anywhere near a 2/3 majority. |
Date | not recorded | From | Kundrati Revolutionary Movement | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | CFP: We believe this would be an improvement as it would increase the possible range of governing coalitions, and allow our cabinets to reflect the diverse viewpoints in our nation. |
Date | not recorded | From | Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | got my vote |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | But if so what will be the point of having elections for praetor? The people elect somebody who they trust to propose a solution for the cabinet. If anybody can propose a cabinet then the people would not have any say at all, the only thing that will matter will be the political games. The curent sistem allow for an equal importance for both the head of state and the parties. None has all the power and neither should. |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | Debate and voting are not necessary, the amendement will not pass anyway. |
Date | not recorded | From | Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | the fact that the bill will not pass it not a reason not to debate it |
Date | not recorded | From | Union of Work-Shy Elements | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | Of course other parties should be able to propose a cabinet coalition. How about a bit of "unity" when it comes to fairness? |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | I'm sorry. |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | "How about a bit of "unity" when it comes to fairness?" If that is so Rihannsu why didn't you or the LD ever proposed this bill when you had the power? We the CFP didn't support the idea then and we don't support it now because it makes election for praetor useless and gives all the power to the senate. |
Date | not recorded | From | Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | it wasn’t available when I was in charge |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | Yes it was, i check the forums everyday i know exactly when it was added. It is true however that you were absent for 2-3 days so maybe it was during that time but still i didn't see the Rihannsu party doing anything at leat you proposed a bill about the algorithm of the elections and said that you will put for vote after the elections. |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | The bill will not pass, period. |
Date | not recorded | From | Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | it needed 2/3 of the Senate to vote for it. 33/90 (me) was absent. therefor the bill would not have been able to pass even if all the parities voted for it |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment: Cabinet Proposals |
Message | I asked why didn't the Rihannsu party proposed such a bill not why they didn't put it up for a vote. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 137 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Dorvik is a nation based on Germanic and old Prussian cultures, it is located on the far north of Artania, making it an almost arctic nation. |
Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell) |