We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Unity Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: CIVIL UNION
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2106
Description[?]:
| Our great nation has become a loose confederation. We need to ensure a Central Government with power. And we need more religion. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: Local governments may set curfews, but national government does not.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: Minors may not use streets or public property beyond the curfew time.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Television stations.
Old value:: All television media are private.
Current: The government subsidises a national TV station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Proposed: The government subsidises a national TV station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to prayer in schools.
Old value:: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden, except in religious schools.
Current: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden.
Proposed: Teacher-led prayers in schools are encouraged.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:03:54, September 03, 2005 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the National Unity Bill |
| Message | Whatever you are going to propose with this, chances are I'll vote against it ;-) |
| Date | 19:09:08, September 03, 2005 CET | From | CIVIL UNION | To | Debating the National Unity Bill |
| Message | :-) |
| Date | 01:40:48, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the National Unity Bill |
| Message | Well I would have actually voted for everything bar the last proposal. |
| Date | 02:43:10, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Alianse Progresivitāte | To | Debating the National Unity Bill |
| Message | And I'd vote for only the last proposal. ... gotta decide actually whether two bad things is worth the one good thing in this... |
| Date | 05:07:10, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Dolgar Libertarian Party | To | Debating the National Unity Bill |
| Message | DNUP: Usually, the rules for compromise are that you should let one unfavorable bill slide for one bill you like. 66% bills that are bad mean you're betraying your core. |
| Date | 22:34:29, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Alianse Progresivitāte | To | Debating the National Unity Bill |
| Message | Yes, but the two bads aren't my core issues while the one good is core until I get my ranking back to non-secular again. :-P |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 120 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 179 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "Let's not forget that we belong to history, that history that men and women who fought before did, that history that men and women who are fighting now will do." - Tera Pisthis, former Selucian politician |