We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Robocracy of Upper Egypt
Details
Submitted by[?]: Robot Avenging Stalinist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2515
Description[?]:
| Given the glorious return of the RASP to continue the freedom fights began by the old RASP and PPP, we can now today declare that The Robocracy of Upper Egypt consisting of Padrilka, Tadraki and Endild has declared sovereignty from Beiteynu and requested entry into the great nation of Pontesi. With the governmental majority, the RASP and PPP have granted this independence freely and ordered the military to stand guard at all borders to prevent any terrorist organizations, namely the BRC from interfering in this independence process. Good luck comrades, we wish your nation well. Rosh HaMemshala Governing Unit 003 |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:26:40, January 12, 2008 CET | From |  One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the The Robocracy of Upper Egypt |
| Message | We are lobbying our government to accept the entrance of such distinguished parties such as yourselves, your example of bravery will go down in history as a great act. |
| Date | 22:41:13, January 12, 2008 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the The Robocracy of Upper Egypt |
| Message | "Succession requires a 2/3 majority. Your self proclaimed theocracy is illegal, and shall be dealt with as such." -Mordechai Eitam |
| Date | 09:04:14, January 13, 2008 CET | From | Robot Avenging Stalinist Party | To | Debating the The Robocracy of Upper Egypt |
| Message | We are not at all a theocracy, please learn what robocracy means before spouting off your false propaganda. |
| Date | 09:05:34, January 13, 2008 CET | From | Robot Avenging Stalinist Party | To | Debating the The Robocracy of Upper Egypt |
| Message | May we also note that previously when the old RASP and PPP attempted to secede, they were told that it took a majority.. now it takes a 2/3 majority. Next will it take a 100% majority? Please, keep your facts straight and constant, instead of changing the rules as it suits your desires and whims. |
| Date | 11:30:25, January 13, 2008 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the The Robocracy of Upper Egypt |
| Message | OOC: You were told you would not be able to seize the province illegally because you lacked the popular support to do so in that Mehoz, not because you lacked a majority of the Knesset. IC: I repeat, a legal succession requires a 2/3 majority. That has always been the case. |
| Date | 11:59:57, January 13, 2008 CET | From | Robot Avenging Stalinist Party | To | Debating the The Robocracy of Upper Egypt |
| Message | OOC: Ahh, I see. |
| Date | 12:10:59, January 13, 2008 CET | From | Robot Avenging Stalinist Party | To | Debating the The Robocracy of Upper Egypt |
| Message | We do have a a 2/3 majority in Tadraki, through the others we merely have 60+% majorities. Regardless your technicalities are merely an attempt at oppression. |
| Date | 12:27:36, January 13, 2008 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the The Robocracy of Upper Egypt |
| Message | "The law is the law. Succession requires 2/3 majority, and it is not oppression that you do not have that majority. I would suggest you end these traitorous actions now, before this revolution goes its inevitable full circle and you are forced to deal with the consequences." -Mordechai Eitam |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 222 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 82 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 96 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "Africa is poor because its investors and its creditors are unspeakably rich" - Naomi Klein |