We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal-Progressive Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: May 2106
Description[?]:
| We, the Liberal-Progressive Union, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. As soon as possible, or final year before elections nothing will get done. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:35:20, September 04, 2005 CET | From |   Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105 |
| Message | I apologise for the lack of debate, but this needed to be done as fast as possible. |
| Date | 11:09:54, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105 |
| Message | I don't really see any problem with waiting, although admittedly it is annoying not being able to start any new bills in these last few months without them being reset. We will go for it though, elections are always exciting!! This problem of not being able to do anything might not be an issue once campaigning and such are introduced to the game. |
| Date | 12:37:21, September 04, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105 |
| Message | We may change our position on this later, but for now we have bills passing through the vote and won't be passed before this bill would come into force. We would like to see these pass/fail before a new election is called. |
| Date | 14:37:22, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105 |
| Message | USM it;s better if you vote yes. Your bill has no chance of passing this time. Try again after elections. |
| Date | 18:08:15, September 04, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105 |
| Message | Yes, but the other bill they are voting for looks to be going there way. Strange that neither of the bills up for vote currently are going your way and you've introduced a new bill for early elections. Some might think you're trying to stop them being passed/blocked... |
| Date | 19:12:43, September 04, 2005 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105 |
| Message | It's not the first time L-PU has used an election to block legislation. |
| Date | 20:24:39, September 04, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105 |
| Message | As much as I need the seats I would rather see the current group of bills go through. |
| Date | 22:32:25, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105 |
| Message | After hearing other parties' concerns I am in agreement. I have changed my vote. |
| Date | 13:02:09, September 05, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the L-PU Call for early elections, September 2105 |
| Message | I was willing to wait until the bills in question were through. To say I was blocking bills is an unfair and poor assumption to make, please refrain from future disrespect towards my character. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 64 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 331 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation. |
| Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle |