We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Flag Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Social Democratic Republicans
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2517
Description[?]:
To eliminate laws barring the desecration of the national flag. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National policy regarding the desecration of the national flag.
Old value:: The national flag may not be desecrated or dishonoured.
Current: The national flag may not be used for commercial purposes.
Proposed: There are no regulations regarding the desecration or use of the national flag.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:27:47, January 15, 2008 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Flag Freedom Act |
Message | Good bill. |
Date | 17:39:42, January 15, 2008 CET | From | People's Reform Party | To | Debating the Flag Freedom Act |
Message | Are you out of your small MIND?! |
Date | 01:47:33, January 16, 2008 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Flag Freedom Act |
Message | We're sorry, we don't share your narrow-minded view regarding rabid nationalism. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 302 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 373 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 75 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "The reason there are so few female politicians is that it is too much trouble to put makeup on two faces." - Maureen Murphy |