We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Parliament Reorganization Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2518
Description[?]:
Resolved to less the numbers of members of the Parliament to ensure better working relationship among the different parties. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 750
Current: 500
Proposed: 251
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:23:39, January 18, 2008 CET | From | United Sizpoao Comrade RevolutionRedArmy | To | Debating the Parliament Reorganization Act |
Message | please dont reduce it, i hate it |
Date | 12:32:15, January 18, 2008 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Parliament Reorganization Act |
Message | Purely in the interest of getting more votes I must vote no. |
Date | 14:58:32, January 18, 2008 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Parliament Reorganization Act |
Message | ooc: I can't support this while I am winning! |
Date | 16:04:05, January 18, 2008 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Parliament Reorganization Act |
Message | it won't change the percentages. You woul still have the same percent of seats. The only difference is that you would not have a many members of parliament. |
Date | 16:14:11, January 18, 2008 CET | From | National Socialist Imperialist League | To | Debating the Parliament Reorganization Act |
Message | When will you people relise that oligarchy is wrong! |
Date | 18:20:51, January 18, 2008 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Parliament Reorganization Act |
Message | Oligarchy is wrong. But that is not what I am proposing. I simply wish to enlarge the voting disctricts to allow for a better concensus candidate. With the smaller districts, we have allowed special interest and regionalism to take hold. |
Date | 18:25:13, January 18, 2008 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Parliament Reorganization Act |
Message | ooc: I like round numbers best, like 100 seats, or 400 or etc.... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 243 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 458 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 49 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
Random quote: "In an underdeveloped country, don't drink the water; in a developed country, don't breathe the air." - Changing Times magazine |