Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 00:41:30
Server time: 11:18:29, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Government Reform Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Republican Federalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2519

Description[?]:

Article 1: To our respected friends in the Conservative and Morality Party, it is with regret we feel the need to propose this measure. We may not all hold high political offices however, our parties have been elected by the people for the people. And our proud citizens, if desired, need the option for their representatives to call forward for a cabinet proposal. There are numerous instance as to the wisdom in this.

Clearly, this is a moderate move. Any absurd proposals will naturally be voted down. Our government must become effective and put parties in positions where their knowledge and skills can help our proud Republic.

Article 2: In accordance with the demands of the people for a more accountable and responsive government, it is far past time we narrow down by some degree legislative terms.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:36:32, January 20, 2008 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Government Reform Act
MessageWe do not have to continuously debate and remake cabinets, I am sure the FIP shall agree with me there. It is an unneccessary waste of government funding and time. (OOC; I hope you realise that the cabinet doesnt actually DO anything In game).

I see no reason why the number of seats should be lessened. That would leave a riddiculously high number of constituents to a representative.

Date15:01:17, January 20, 2008 CET
From Republican Federalist Party
ToDebating the Government Reform Act
Message(OOC: I realize this and you could have sent this to me in a message. I'm playing a party and from that perspective having you, in control of the government and being the only one able to call forth cabinet elections-it is within RP interest for me "rail" against it. Don't think I mean any offense at all towards you. Also, Article 2 is an error. Ignore this bill. I will re-propose this though with Article one remaining for the aforementioned reasons. Sorry ladies and gents.)

Date15:01:47, January 20, 2008 CET
From Republican Federalist Party
ToDebating the Government Reform Act
MessageOOC: Vote No on this.

Date15:05:49, January 20, 2008 CET
From Republican Federalist Party
ToDebating the Government Reform Act
MessageOOC: Revamped http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=170386&vote=yes

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
         

    Total Seats: 360

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 65


    Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

    Random quote: "An economist is a surgeon with an excellent scalpel and a rough-edged lancet, who operates beautifully on the dead and tortures the living." - Nicholas Chamfort

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 52