We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Restriction for pornography on TV
Details
Submitted by[?]: Justice&Freedom
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2521
Description[?]:
We must protect child and tutelate adult's freedom to watch pornography at the same time |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Current: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Proposed: Sexually explicit material is allowed, but violent or hard core pornography is banned.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content may be shown all day long.
Current: Sexually explicit content may be shown all day long.
Proposed: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:25:08, January 23, 2008 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Restriction for pornography on TV |
Message | "tutelate adult's freedom" What? "We must protect child" If children need "protecting" from pornography, then the parents should do it. |
Date | 11:17:33, January 23, 2008 CET | From | Justice&Freedom | To | Debating the Restriction for pornography on TV |
Message | an adult is free to watch pornography, but a child can't choose. i'm not against pornography, but we must balance child's protection only against violent and hardcore pornography. article 2 instead gives an istrument to help parents in this "protection". are you against all proposal or only against 1? we can try to mediate... |
Date | 16:45:53, January 23, 2008 CET | From | Justice&Freedom | To | Debating the Restriction for pornography on TV |
Message | does someone want to explain his vote? |
Date | 09:21:06, January 24, 2008 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Restriction for pornography on TV |
Message | "are you against all proposal or only against 1? we can try to mediate..." No, I'm against "protecting" children from the "evils" of pornography. I fail to see how porn harms anyone anywhere at anytime. |
Date | 10:11:39, January 24, 2008 CET | From | Justice&Freedom | To | Debating the Restriction for pornography on TV |
Message | pornography it's no an evil.... hard-core and violent pornography are evils!!!! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 104 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 171 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 25 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty, and there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some war or other in order that the people may require a leader." - Plato |