We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CP.0003.2521 Private Media Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2522
Description[?]:
The Conservative Party supports a publicly-funded media stations but also wishes to see the private sector provide media stations. This bill does not take away any current rights; it increases the choices for consumers and gives them freedom of choice in choosing what they want to watch. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Radio stations.
Old value:: The government subsidises a national radio station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Current: The government subsidises a national radio station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Proposed: The government subsidises independent non-profit-making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Television stations.
Old value:: The government subsidises a national TV station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Current: The government subsidises a national TV station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Proposed: The government subsidises independent non-profit-making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:52:42, January 24, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the CP.0003.2521 Private Media Bill |
Message | We have no realstrong feelings about it either way, as wewish it to remain one or the other. We would like to leave the Radio one as is and change the TV one though, for research purposes. |
Date | 04:00:12, January 24, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the CP.0003.2521 Private Media Bill |
Message | The CP agrees with the DSP that these are the two viable options for the people. Although it would prefer going ahead with both, we are up for a compromise. |
Date | 07:47:06, January 24, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the CP.0003.2521 Private Media Bill |
Message | We also are somewhat indifferent on this issue. We shall vote with consensus unless persuaded otherwise. |
Date | 16:45:37, January 24, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the CP.0003.2521 Private Media Bill |
Message | Would the DSP still oppose the bill if the Radio proposal remained? |
Date | 16:47:22, January 24, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the CP.0003.2521 Private Media Bill |
Message | Sorry, DSP, I shouldn't have assumed you would oppose. But if the bill were to remain with this two proposals, would you support or oppose? |
Date | 17:15:35, January 24, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the CP.0003.2521 Private Media Bill |
Message | Honestly we have no real opinions on it, though we would support it since the proposal we are partially against is'nt being changed to something we're really against. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 734 | |||||||
no | Total Seats: 16 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
Random quote: "Take our country back" - Conservative Republican campaign slogan for the 4690 Likatonian election |